34 replies to this topic

[Darknessence]

Acordill, appreciate the info!

[Darknessence]

Acordill, i fxz'd the OTA 246, now the boot screen won't display. I can physically see the "M" logo and physically see the recovery menu. I can hear the droid boot animation just wont display. Any advice?

[Darknessence]

Nevermind, figured it out. It must have been a bad download or transfer from phone. Re-downloaded the fxz straight to computer and all systems are go!! Woo, thought it was gonna end up no bueno.

[projektorboy]

Has anyone tested the bootloader on 6.7.246 to see if it responds to moto's fastboot oem get_unlock_data command?

[acordill]

Nevermind, figured it out. It must have been a bad download or transfer from phone. Re-downloaded the fxz straight to computer and all systems are go!! Woo, thought it was gonna end up no bueno.

That is why it is ALWAYS a good thing to check MD5s to make sure files are not corrupt. But congrats on getting it working.

[k.c.cole]

Thanks for posting this. Flashed with no issues using RSD 5.7

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

[TragicRemedy]

Nevermind, figured it out. It must have been a bad download or transfer from phone. Re-downloaded the fxz straight to computer and all systems are go!! Woo, thought it was gonna end up no bueno.

I would consider yourself lucky a corrupted fxz was recoverable....

[CantMesWitDis]

So dummy check....
I'm running .230 still and WAS going to FXZ back to 905 and go OTA to get on the 246 release....however now can I just FXZ to 246 using RSD?

[King Howie]

So dummy check....
I'm running .230 still and WAS going to FXZ back to 905 and go OTA to get on the 246 release....however now can I just FXZ to 246 using RSD?

yes

[Craze]

All depends on if you care about settings and applications you have installed. If you do, do not use this to flash to stock 246. It will remove your items on phone partition and internal sd card. You can use samuari's hob to install 246 and keep your items. I personally use Tibu and everything is on external sd but not everyone backs up there apps and settings / data

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

[johnlgalt]

You can also modify the XML file to skip the internal storage wipe and data wipe - However, I strongly recommend that you do not skip data wipe - even if you were on an ICS leak, even if you were on .246 leak before (which really begs the question why are you doing this in the first place) I'd recommend wiping data and starting from scratch. It's time consuming, but worth it in the long run.

Skipping the wiping of internal storage is your own call - I'm ambivalent about it, but personally I skip it every time. Sme apps save data to internal storage, and I find that having to copy it to the compute, and then having to copy it all back after wiping it is a major PITA.

[johnlgalt]

I'm taking the liberty of moving this over to my MediaFire account, and will also add it to my 4Shared account, for all folks to be able to get faster DL speeds from.

Links up in about 10 minutes.

[johnlgalt]

OK, MF link:

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

[Dave12308]

how come the file is so much smaller than normal for FXZ's (normally a little over 650mb.. this ones 432mb)? is it just that much higher of compression rate? if so why? and any idea why the webtop img was renamed from grfs.img to vendor.img? and then the only other thing i was curious about is the only file thats missing from this fxz that was in both the 902 and 905 fxz's which is the lbl file? anyways.. if anyone could share some insight it would be much appreciated. and of course THANKS to Pzyduck for sharing the file!

My guess is that WebTop 3.0 is smaller than the prior version since it is essentially a tablet version of the ICS OS and not a separate Linux install.

[DLuke]

My guess is that WebTop 3.0 is smaller than the prior version since it is essentially a tablet version of the ICS OS and not a separate Linux install.

nah oddly enough the webtop image is the exact same size as in the 905 fxz.. its renamed from grfs.img to vendor.img but is still the same size.. all of the files within the zips are essentially the same size.. really the only difference between the two is the renaming of the webtop image and the the one lbl file thats in 905 but not 246 but its only a few kb file.. so its gotta just be a greater rate of compression, i just have no idea why.. and not that it really matters or anything, i was just curious