You'll have to run it and see
I don't own this phone and it hasn't been out long enough to tell. It'll take some time.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
i believe i'll do just that. o:
backing up now.
Posted 06 May 2013 - 06:34 PM
You'll have to run it and see
I don't own this phone and it hasn't been out long enough to tell. It'll take some time.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
i believe i'll do just that. o:
backing up now.
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:04 PM
I am running DT cotex I mean codex rom and its smooth with this kernel
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:09 PM
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:16 PM
What process should I go through to flash?
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:19 PM
What process should I go through to flash?
+1
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:20 PM
Just like you're flashing a ROM but no wipes.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
thanks will try it now
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:35 PM
So you just flash this right on top of whatever ROM and you're g2g? Does it matter if it's a 4.2.2 or 4.1.2 ROM?
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:36 PM
So you just flash this right on top of whatever ROM and you're g2g? Does it matter if it's a 4.2.2 or 4.1.2 ROM?
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:38 PM
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:40 PM
Posted 06 May 2013 - 07:41 PM
Flick was my dd on my xt912 so I'm glad to see this coming from u. Thanks a lot.
Posted 06 May 2013 - 08:36 PM
Posted 06 May 2013 - 08:41 PM
Seems good.. Just flashed it on Nitroglycerin's Elemental X rom :-)
Sent from my XT926 using Tapatalk 2
Posted 06 May 2013 - 08:54 PM
Nitro has a ROM for the XT926? Can I get a link?
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
Posted 06 May 2013 - 08:58 PM
Well it's exciting to have kernel development for a moto device for obvious reasons and I'm sure roms will be a dime a dozen for this device soon (which is great don't get me wrong) but I'm assuming kernel development will be more rare. So it's great to have u back with your particular expertise.Hell yeah! I enjoyed working on Flick and haven't been able to find the same joy since.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:04 PM
Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:13 PM
Question... I'm on mikeyinids overclocked aokp right now. And i understand if you're off the opinion that overclocking is pointless, far be it from me to debate that with u but, his kernel also has a minimum of 192 mhz. Do u think that has battery saving potential? I personally am more inclined to underclocking for battery life. What do u think?
It does have battery saving potential, the lower the frequency the less mV the CPU needs, the less power is consumed.
Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:28 PM
Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:37 PM
That was my assumption. Good deal. Is that something u might consider doing for this kernel? And why exactly is overclocking pointless? Even under heavy usage or difficult tasks?
Yeah, I'll probably add more frequencies. Uses more battery. Most of the time there is no visible increase in smoothness.
Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:59 PM
Source has been pushed to Github for those that care.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users