#1
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:46 PM
#2
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:01 PM
[ sent from _base2 ]
#3
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:02 PM
And there was much rejoicing.
[ sent from _base2 ]
- Hardtime3015 likes this
#4
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:22 PM
This is by no means a put-down on the STS team whatsoever, but if those guys can get something working so fast why the hell can't Moto? Don't they supposedly have some of the best in the business working on this?
:-D :-D
#5
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:29 PM
No they already have something fully stable with ICS for the RAZR but MOTO just wants you to buy that one with ics on then they will come out with the dev version razr with ics.Seriously.
This is by no means a put-down on the STS team whatsoever, but if those guys can get something working so fast why the hell can't Moto? Don't they supposedly have some of the best in the business working on this?
#6
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:34 PM
The lack of depth and blanket statements in the article leads me to believe that "OTHER" MOTO devices for a device wide transition to ICS was more of the Topic. Lets not forget our EU counterpart already has a leak of ICS... Same Hardware.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
- lightbayne likes this
#7
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:39 PM
:-D :-D
#8
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:41 PM
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
#9
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:58 PM
#10
Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:10 PM
“That,” replied Hardin, “is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one @$#%^ thing, and said it so that you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire.”
No point in getting mad over, essentially, nothing.
#11
Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:11 PM
:-D :-D
#12
Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:16 PM
Solution: Moto hires dhacker and hashcode.
And there was much rejoicing.
[ sent from _base2 ]
+1000
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
#13
Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:52 PM
#14
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:19 PM
#15
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:22 PM
If we had an unlocked bootloader like they have in the labs that Moto develops stuff in, that would not be a problem.You guys are too cynical. Go look at hashcode's personal blog, where he discusses frustration trying to get the camera to work with ICS on whatever phone he is developing for. Also, Cyanogen(mod) just recently put out a blog post update saying essentially the same thing as Motorola - they are stuck waiting for the manufacturers who made the cameras, etc. to build ICS drivers for them, and that's why they can't get a CM9 build completed. I haven't
#16
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:49 PM
You mean the original engineering schematics, firmware code, and developers that built the stuff?If we had an unlocked bootloader like they have in the labs that Moto develops stuff in, that would not be a problem.
#17
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:01 PM
If we had an unlocked bootloader like they have in the labs that Moto develops stuff in, that would not be a problem.
Added level of difficulty : 8.5
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users