24 replies to this topic

[theonlycosmic]

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

Quad-core processors are not always better. Here's why dual-core-only availability in the U.S. is not exactly a bad thing.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Well you are comparing a lower end processor to a new processor so not really fair, lol. Imagine 1.5GHz quad-core ARM Cortex A15....that would be beautiful.

Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2

[TopherRZ]

Well you are comparing a lower end processor to a new processor so not really fair, lol. Imagine 1.5GHz quad-core ARM Cortex A15....that would be beautiful.

Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2

Definitely. That's not too much of a stretch. I'm sure we'll see that within a couple years, the way things are moving now.

[TopherRZ]

Nobody NEEDS it. Its just nice to have. We all functioned just fine before smart phones came out, now everyone has one.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

[theonlycosmic]

When you can give me an honestly good reason why you NEED 1.5gHz and quad core. This phone will have my interest. The point is, you don't.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

It isn't needed but someone was just saying that quad cores can be sometimes less efficient when he was comparing different processors. Personally I think the quad core processing is just for baterry life, there is no need for so much power, lol

Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2