Jump to content


Photo

Fingerprint Unlocking, A 5th Amendment Bypass?.....


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 livinginkaos

livinginkaos

    I don't know what I'm doing anymore.....

  • Administrator
  • 13,853 posts
  • Google+:Hangouts - livinginkaos@gmail.com
  • LocationOregon
  • Current Device(s):Samsung S8+ / Pixel XL 128gb / iPhone 7+ 256gb / iPad Pro 12.9" / Samsung Chromrbook Plus / Pixel C / Nexus 6p 128gb / Nexus 6 / Nexus 6 on Fi / Nexus 9 / Moto 360^2 / Nvidia Shield TV Pro / Nvidia Shield Tablet / HTC EVODesign on FreedomPop / Chromecast / Surface Pro 3 i7 / Samsung Tab Pro 12.2 / Lenovo Win8 Tab / Eee Slate / '13 Nexus 7

Posted 18 January 2017 - 12:05 PM

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

 

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

  631.62KB   8 downloads

 

As reported on Arstechnica.com in

Please Login or Register to see this Hidden Content

, recently a judge ruled against a criminal who appealed his ruling based on the fact he was forced to use his fingerprint to unlock his cell phone during the investigation - citing his 5th amendment rights as to not self-incriminate.  The ruling found that the fingerprint itself is proof of self, not proof of knowledge - giving them full right to utilize this for the purpose of unlocking the device.  Had it been a passcode or other form of password/phrase/pattern, this may have been completely different......

 

Many devices will require you to use a passcode/phrase/pattern on the first unlocking of a device.  The investigators in this case must have been quick to act or were fore-thinking enough to not restart or turn off the device..... So, food for thought.  Perhaps a new feature should ensue in that your primary pass-"thing" should be required beyond a particular length of time?

 

What are your thoughts?

 

via: Arstichnica.com


  • Badger1313 and Hackaxis like this

b2wvCBn.png

Sig by livinginkaos
Samsung S8+ / Pixel XL 128gb / iPhone 7+ 256gb / iPad Pro 12.9" / Samsung Chromrbook Plus / Pixel C / Nexus 6p 128gb / Nexus 6 / Nexus 6 on Fi / Nexus 9 / Moto 360^2 / Nvidia Shield TV Pro / Nvidia Shield Tablet / HTC EVODesign on FreedomPop / Chromecast / Surface Pro 3 i7 / Samsung Tab Pro 12.2 / Lenovo Win8 Tab / Eee Slate / '13 Nexus 7


#2 cmh714

cmh714

    Tech Service & Beyond

  • Smod
  • 3,271 posts
  • LocationSoCal
  • Current Device(s):Nexus 6

Posted 19 January 2017 - 08:35 AM

My thoughts are this is BS but I will not be utilizing a fingerprint for any phone in the future.....


  • Badger1313 and kellym like this

#3 livinginkaos

livinginkaos

    I don't know what I'm doing anymore.....

  • Administrator
  • 13,853 posts
  • Google+:Hangouts - livinginkaos@gmail.com
  • LocationOregon
  • Current Device(s):Samsung S8+ / Pixel XL 128gb / iPhone 7+ 256gb / iPad Pro 12.9" / Samsung Chromrbook Plus / Pixel C / Nexus 6p 128gb / Nexus 6 / Nexus 6 on Fi / Nexus 9 / Moto 360^2 / Nvidia Shield TV Pro / Nvidia Shield Tablet / HTC EVODesign on FreedomPop / Chromecast / Surface Pro 3 i7 / Samsung Tab Pro 12.2 / Lenovo Win8 Tab / Eee Slate / '13 Nexus 7

Posted 19 January 2017 - 08:43 AM

Unfortunately this set a precedence and will be used as a basis moving forward.  I really think there should be a user kill option of some sort.  An android security contact of mine suggested a pin that will wipe a device - which actually has merit on many levels.  


  • Badger1313, kellym and spainter like this

b2wvCBn.png

Sig by livinginkaos
Samsung S8+ / Pixel XL 128gb / iPhone 7+ 256gb / iPad Pro 12.9" / Samsung Chromrbook Plus / Pixel C / Nexus 6p 128gb / Nexus 6 / Nexus 6 on Fi / Nexus 9 / Moto 360^2 / Nvidia Shield TV Pro / Nvidia Shield Tablet / HTC EVODesign on FreedomPop / Chromecast / Surface Pro 3 i7 / Samsung Tab Pro 12.2 / Lenovo Win8 Tab / Eee Slate / '13 Nexus 7


#4 cmh714

cmh714

    Tech Service & Beyond

  • Smod
  • 3,271 posts
  • LocationSoCal
  • Current Device(s):Nexus 6

Posted 19 January 2017 - 09:00 AM

Agreed that precedence has been set. I heard about this quite a few months ago and was curious where it would go. As usual, it comes to convenience over security. Like I stated, I foe one will not be using any biometric if the law thinks its acceptable to "take" that from me.

 

Sad...


  • Badger1313 and spainter like this

#5 soocold

soocold

    OC & OCD Specialist

  • Smod
  • 8,683 posts
  • Google+:amcsocold@gmail.com
  • LocationTouching something electronic
  • Current Device(s):LG G4, Nexus 6

Posted 21 January 2017 - 03:49 AM

Now I'm rethinking the fingerprint function. I do like the kill code idea but don't know what the ramifications would be in the court of law

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk


  • spainter likes this

pveoVTW.png

sig by jayrod

 

2760259.png

 

The Rules-Follow them.

Do you like our forum? Do you call it your second home? Help us with the upkeep





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users