6.12.174/6.12.173 Radio Field Test
#1
Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:06 PM
Pretty awful right?
I haven't used anything other than my Gnex for tethering since, and I recently put my Razr on 6.12.174 (Used 6.12.173 LTE radio, but a further upgraded CDMA Radio in 6.12.174). Now I get this:
Huge difference. 2-3 bars of LTE in the same place where on 6.11.748 had 1 bar of LTE...sometimes. To confirm with peeps, I upgraded to 6.12.174 while inside of the classroom today and in the class before I started I got LTE with 0 bars in my seat.
May be a fluke, buts is a great fluke for me!
Anyone else have field tests of 6.12.173 or 6.12.174 they wish to share?
Please do not Personal Message me for help or troubleshooting. They will be ignored. Post in threads or start one in Q&A sections.
#2
Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:19 PM
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
#4
Posted 03 February 2012 - 06:32 PM
Me to as im still using safestrap and it would be a lil work around to get to 174 without rsd'ing. However if there is noticable increase i will. ' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />interested in the different speeds for .173 vs ,174
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
#5
Posted 03 February 2012 - 08:15 PM
interested in the different speeds for .173 vs ,174
The lte radio and kernel don't change so....
- mattlgroff likes this
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
#6
Posted 03 February 2012 - 09:13 PM
#7
Posted 03 February 2012 - 09:35 PM
- mattlgroff likes this
#8
Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:22 AM
Just would like some general feeds and Speedtest.net tests of differences if wouldn't mindMy house gets zero 4g but my job gets great 4g. I'll be glad to help you test just let me know what tests you want me to run.
Please do not Personal Message me for help or troubleshooting. They will be ignored. Post in threads or start one in Q&A sections.
#9
Posted 04 February 2012 - 11:27 AM
Ill post my averages and highs and lows here once I'm done.
Sent from somewhere using something
:-D :-D
#10
Posted 04 February 2012 - 03:22 PM
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk
Attached Files
- mattlgroff likes this
#11
Posted 04 February 2012 - 07:49 PM
Sent from somewhere using something
:-D :-D
#12
Posted 04 February 2012 - 10:49 PM
#13
Posted 05 February 2012 - 08:09 PM
Guess I will have to the test at work this week since home testing is a bust. Thankfully I have good wifi speeds.
#14
Posted 06 February 2012 - 08:15 AM
Just curious tho on which set of radios is better
#15
Posted 06 February 2012 - 08:26 AM
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
#16
Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:06 AM
#17
Posted 06 February 2012 - 11:28 AM
the LTE radio on 173/174 is the same. the CDMA radio is different.
thanks man. i thought only one got updated just didn't know which is was.....lol.
#18
Posted 06 February 2012 - 11:59 AM
the LTE radio on 173/174 is the same. the CDMA radio is different.
But the LTE radio is improved over .748, right?
#19
Posted 06 February 2012 - 12:45 PM
But the LTE radio is improved over .748, right?
In my experience, very much so.
#20
Posted 06 February 2012 - 01:53 PM
But the LTE radio is improved over .748, right?
Correct.
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users