this is a long shot but can anyone running this leak or anything after .173 comment on Android OS battery usage? There is a pretty large thread going on the motorola owners forum about an overactive suspend process that is sucking battery.
Unofficial Update 6.12.176
Started by
mattlgroff
, Feb 14 2012 07:59 PM
68 replies to this topic
#22
JungleKing76
-
- Members
-
- 446 posts
Droid Master
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:15 AM
this is a long shot but can anyone running this leak or anything after .173 comment on Android OS battery usage? There is a pretty large thread going on the motorola owners forum about an overactive suspend process that is sucking battery.
I have never really paid too much attention to my battery stats but every now and then I look and I have never seen my OS go over 12% on any of the stock builds.... don't know if that is good or bad by others standards.
Anyway, just checked mine and it is at 11% right now for OS running the 176 leak. I have been running the leak for about 24 hours now but currently I have not been off the charger that long so I will check again later as I use up more battery and see what the OS is at.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Xparent Purple Tapatalk
#23
mechatricity
-
- Members
-
- 151 posts
Member
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:21 AM
I have never really paid too much attention to my battery stats but every now and then I look and I have never seen my OS go over 12% on any of the stock builds.... don't know if that is good or bad by others standards.
Anyway, just checked mine and it is at 11% right now for OS running the 176 leak. I have been running the leak for about 24 hours now but currently I have not been off the charger that long so I will check again later as I use up more battery and see what the OS is at.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Xparent Purple Tapatalk
Thanks for the response. Mine is currently sitting at #1 usage, 39%, wifi off, on LTE, very light usage.
Don't want to turn this into a battery thread but it appears to be a bug in the OS rather than an app.
#24
arcanexvi
-
- Superuser
-
- 869 posts
Property of Roo
- LocationSchaumburg, IL
Posted 15 February 2012 - 04:39 PM
I have never really paid too much attention to my battery stats but every now and then I look and I have never seen my OS go over 12% on any of the stock builds.... don't know if that is good or bad by others standards.
Anyway, just checked mine and it is at 11% right now for OS running the 176 leak. I have been running the leak for about 24 hours now but currently I have not been off the charger that long so I will check again later as I use up more battery and see what the OS is at.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Xparent Purple Tapatalk
Any application or service that doesn't properly identify its usage to android just gets dumped into the "android OS" pool. Hence the high usage. Most of that usage isn't actually the OS. I'm @ 70% batt after 8 hours with the android OS chewing ~ 30% of my battery. There are plenty of other things running in the background that aren't reported on that screen (words with friends/facebook/etc etc). These all usually get dumped into the "android OS" category.
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
#25
islandfever
-
- Members
-
- 353 posts
Droid Master
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:23 PM
What is thr radio on this? Can someone post?
Is it different than the one that was upgraded in 174/75?
Is it different than the one that was upgraded in 174/75?
#26
Baby Duck
-
- Members
-
- 61 posts
Member
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:57 PM
Will this work on the new ics rom?
#27
mattlgroff
-
- Developer
-
- 2,298 posts
The Dark Knight
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:59 PM
Yup!Will this work on the new ics rom?
- JimmyInTheROC likes this
Please do not Personal Message me for help or troubleshooting. They will be ignored. Post in threads or start one in Q&A sections.
#28
Baby Duck
-
- Members
-
- 61 posts
Member
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:10 PM
Yup!
Cool! Awesome work on the ICS. U are appreciated!
#29
islandfever
-
- Members
-
- 353 posts
Droid Master
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:14 PM
matt?What is thr radio on this? Can someone post?
Is it different than the one that was upgraded in 174/75?
#30
mattlgroff
-
- Developer
-
- 2,298 posts
The Dark Knight
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:15 PM
Oh I thought I commented on this. my bad.matt?
The radio seems the same to me. I haven't MD5'd it or anything though.
Please do not Personal Message me for help or troubleshooting. They will be ignored. Post in threads or start one in Q&A sections.
#31
islandfever
-
- Members
-
- 353 posts
Droid Master
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:20 PM
can you tell me what it reads from about phone?Oh I thought I commented on this. my bad.
The radio seems the same to me. I haven't MD5'd it or anything though.
The 173 phone is 4.06
174 was 4.07 I think
#32
orcsbane13
-
- Members
-
- 65 posts
Member
Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:00 AM
can you tell me what it reads from about phone?
The 173 phone is 4.06
174 was 4.07 I think
It's 4.07
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk
- mattlgroff likes this
#33
mattlgroff
-
- Developer
-
- 2,298 posts
The Dark Knight
Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:02 AM
Thanks orcsbaneIt's 4.07
Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk
Please do not Personal Message me for help or troubleshooting. They will be ignored. Post in threads or start one in Q&A sections.
#34
islandfever
-
- Members
-
- 353 posts
Droid Master
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:02 AM
Can this be flashed on top of droidtheorys clutch?
#35
arcanexvi
-
- Superuser
-
- 869 posts
Property of Roo
- LocationSchaumburg, IL
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:11 AM
Can this be flashed on top of droidtheorys clutch?
Bold text. 2nd line bro.
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
#36
islandfever
-
- Members
-
- 353 posts
Droid Master
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:13 AM
AhhBold text. 2nd line bro.
Could we put clutch on after?
#37
arcanexvi
-
- Superuser
-
- 869 posts
Property of Roo
- LocationSchaumburg, IL
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:14 AM
Ahh
Could we put clutch on after?
That'd be a question for that thread.
I don't follow that particular ROM but if it's 173 based it should be fine. If it's based on the older 748 expect issues.
Become a supporting member and help, get a DEV a phone, by going HERE
Please take the time to read our forum rules and guidelines.
#38
islandfever
-
- Members
-
- 353 posts
Droid Master
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:16 AM
it is a 173 debloat/speed mod to stock 173That'd be a question for that thread. I don't follow that particular ROM but if it's 173 based it should be fine. If it's based on the older 748 expect issues.
#39
mechatricity
-
- Members
-
- 151 posts
Member
Posted 16 February 2012 - 09:03 AM
Any application or service that doesn't properly identify its usage to android just gets dumped into the "android OS" pool. Hence the high usage. Most of that usage isn't actually the OS. I'm @ 70% batt after 8 hours with the android OS chewing ~ 30% of my battery. There are plenty of other things running in the background that aren't reported on that screen (words with friends/facebook/etc etc). These all usually get dumped into the "android OS" category.
Good observation, thanks.
#40
Aixelsyd
-
- Administrator
-
- 640 posts
Freak on a Leash
- LocationWindy City
- Current Device(s):x13 Dev Ed & x14 Pure Ed & Droid Turbo
Posted 16 February 2012 - 10:25 AM
Dumb question as I think it needs to be a little more clear in the OP. Are you saying ppl should temp unroot, or NOT temp unroot using Rootkeeper before updating. I've seen to many posts on the leaks not being clear where some say yes do it & others say no just protect root. Speaking for myself to date in any of the files I have tried/tested I've never temp unrooted. I just protect root using Rootkeeper and then update and have not had a problem.
- coryj558 likes this
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users
