Kernel Tweaks For Battery Life/performance
#41
Posted 24 June 2012 - 07:52 AM
#42
Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:08 AM
I'm going to be editing the battery script today tell me what you think. I don't want it to get worse:) .
Looking forward for it
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
#43
Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:25 AM
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
#44
Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:25 AM
#45
Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:45 AM
Can I use this on full stock .211?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Yes, follow same instructions in OP.
They should be requesting Su at boot, do you have notifications enabled?how do we know for sure if this is running at boot as neither script manager or rom toolbox says it was granted superuser after boot?
If you have ROM toolbox, make sure your CPU governor is hotplug, dirty ratio is 90, your I/O is deadline. So to answer your question, there is no easy way to check it's working, other than checking that the values are in place manually. In a couple of days I'll have a flashable zip, so this won't be a problem for long.
#46
Posted 24 June 2012 - 09:02 AM
Yes, follow same instructions in OP.
They should be requesting Su at boot, do you have notifications enabled?
If you have ROM toolbox, make sure your CPU governor is hotplug, dirty ratio is 90, your I/O is deadline. So to answer your question, there is no easy way to check it's working, other than checking that the values are in place manually. In a couple of days I'll have a flashable zip, so this won't be a problem for long.
setcpu says it was granted su after boot but none of the other programs to run this script do for some reason?
#47
Posted 24 June 2012 - 09:51 AM
setcpu says it was granted su after boot but none of the other programs to run this script do for some reason?
Are they being granted Su in Superuser? Do you have notifications just for those applications turned off? Is there something stopping them from coming on at boot? I've never encountered this problem, so I'm just spit balling.
#48
Posted 24 June 2012 - 09:53 AM
#49
Posted 25 June 2012 - 12:50 PM
Attached Files
#50
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:16 PM
Got some errors with the battery script, fyi:
Thanks, though I am aware of those, the guys over on XDA found those errors. It'll be fixed in the next version. Which is coming in a few days.
#51
Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:28 PM
Strangely enough, I'm getting consistently better scores (~6,350 on AnTuTu) with the Battery Saver script than I am with the Performance script (averaging ~6,250).
What gives?
#52
Posted 26 June 2012 - 07:09 PM
Found the Problem! The performance script wrote to disc less and the battery saving script was writing to disc more. I switched the values, must have put the wrong values in. Use the code, because that's what I updated the new values to.I'm using ROM Toolbox to run these scripts at startup.
Strangely enough, I'm getting consistently better scores (~6,350 on AnTuTu) with the Battery Saver script than I am with the Performance script (averaging ~6,250).
What gives?
#53
Posted 26 June 2012 - 07:42 PM
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
#54
Posted 26 June 2012 - 08:50 PM
You don't need to change the extension unless it's running as an int.d script, in that case you don't need an extension. I assume that you were using the battery saving script, as I tested and looked at both. Notepad++ was doing this weird thing where it puts a block after every line, which was breaking the script. It's fixed now though.When i dl file its a txt file. Should i rename to a .sh file or what? I cant get it to work
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
#55
Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:30 PM
#56
Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:42 PM
My battery saving script is now integrated into KOA AOKP. Flash it for an awesome ROM and my tweaks.
Been on aokp and when hicks said it was in tonights build I instantly flashed so far so good going to fully test tomorrow.
Sent from my .211 leak razr do you wanna get cut?
DroidRazr Maxx HD safestrapping!!
#57
Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:23 PM
Been on aokp and when hicks said it was in tonights build I instantly flashed so far so good going to fully test tomorrow.
Sent from my .211 leak razr do you wanna get cut?
Yeah ,I hadn't just flashed Liquid Smooth,great ROM, check it out here: I would probably be on that. I was on it before, but Singlecore was calling my name...
#58
Posted 27 June 2012 - 03:34 AM
Yes, follow same instructions in OP.
They should be requesting Su at boot, do you have notifications enabled?
If you have ROM toolbox, make sure your CPU governor is hotplug, dirty ratio is 90, your I/O is deadline. So to answer your question, there is no easy way to check it's working, other than checking that the values are in place manually. In a couple of days I'll have a flashable zip, so this won't be a problem for long.
I can not find where to check I/O setting in Rom toolbox. How to find it?
#59
Posted 27 June 2012 - 04:09 AM
Use the code, because that's what I updated the new values to.
Use what code..?
I manually changed the botched values according to what you specified your XDA thread... I know that benchmarks are probably not the most reliable testing mechanism for this, but I still can't manage to break 6,300 on AnTuTu with the modified Performance script.
#60
Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:47 AM
What I mean by the code is the text, not the downloadable file. Hmm, just benched in Antutu, I got 6451, what ROM are you on? Do you have any underclock settings? A lot of the new stuff in the script, like new minfree values and OOM values don't effect bench scores, they just improve RAM management and multitasking.Use what code..?
I manually changed the botched values according to what you specified your XDA thread... I know that benchmarks are probably not the most reliable testing mechanism for this, but I still can't manage to break 6,300 on AnTuTu with the modified Performance script.
I can not find where to check I/O setting in Rom toolbox. How to find it?
Sorry, in kernel tweaks it's the scheduler, I come up with my own semi true names.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: kernel, battery life
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users